Bitcoin

Tech Industry Leaders Call for AI Labs to Pause Development for Safety, Coinbase CEO Disagrees

This week, 2,600 tech industry moguls and entrepreneurs, including Elon Musk, Gary Marcus, and Steve Wozniak, signed an open letter requesting artificial intelligence (AI) labs to pause research and development for six months. The signatories believe that safety programs and regulations need to be strengthened, as they assert that AI labs are currently in an “out-of-control race to develop and deploy” this technology. On Thursday, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong disagreed with this approach, stating that people should not “let fear stop progress.”

The Debate on AI Safety: Tech Industry Leaders Call for a Pause in Development, Many Oppose the Idea

An open letter signed by 2,600 leaders and researchers in the tech industry recommends that AI labs pause their work for six months, and if they refuse, governments should impose a moratorium on development. The group believes that AI is “now becoming human-competitive at general tasks,” and asserts that powerful AI systems should be developed “only once we are confident that their effects will be positive and their risks will be manageable.”

“Unfortunately, this level of planning and management is not happening, even though recent months have seen AI labs locked in an out-of-control race to develop and deploy ever more powerful digital minds that no one — not even their creators — can understand, predict, or reliably control,” the open letter states. The signatories who signed the letter include Tesla CEO Elon Musk, politician Andrew Yang, AI author Gary Marcus, and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak.

Furthermore, the letter notes that AI developers need to work with policymakers if they are creating powerful AI systems. The letter emphasizes that AI could threaten democracy and cause dramatic economic and political disruptions. However, while the letter has more than 2,000 signatories, not everyone agrees with pausing, and some have called it “ridiculous.” “Among all the obvious reasons why this temporary pause seems like a silly idea, I also can’t help feeling like this could be a knee-jerk reaction by the corporate elite after having seen just how easily this technology will make many of their goods and services irrelevant,” one individual wrote.

“This is a bad call. Only forward,” another individual tweeted. On Thursday, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong shared his opinion on the matter. Armstrong doesn’t think fear should stop progress and said that people should be wary of such plans. “Count me among the people who think this is a bad idea,” Armstrong tweeted. “There are no ‘experts’ to adjudicate this issue, and many disparate actors will never agree. Committees and bureaucracy won’t solve anything.” Armstrong added:

As with many technologies, there are dangers, but we should keep marching forward with progress because the good outweighs the bad. The marketplace of ideas leads to better outcomes than central planning. Don’t ever let fear stop progress, and be wary of anyone trying to capture control in some central authority.

Many others believe that pausing AI development is not a good idea, and some insist that the plan is for AI monopolies that are already leading the race to maintain self-preservation. Regius Professor and CEO of Chemify, Lee Cronin, wrote, “This is nonsensical. It’s like asking to destroy the book that explains how to build the printing press, which itself was printed on the printing press.” The discussion regarding a pause in AI development has become a topical and controversial subject this week, and it’s currently unclear whether AI labs will follow through with the suggestion.

Tags in this story
ai, AI development, AI labs, AI monopolies, Andrew Yang, Artificial Intelligence, Authority, central planning, Chemify, control, controversy, Creators, Democracy, Development, digital minds, discussion, economic disruptions, Elon Musk, entrepreneurs, Fear, Gary Marcus, manageable risks, moratorium, Open Letter, out-of-control race, pausing, policymakers, political disruptions, positive effects, powerful AI systems, printing press, progress, Regius Professor, Regulations, Research, safety programs, self-preservation, signatories, Steve Wozniak, suggestion, tech industry, technology

What are your thoughts on the debate over whether AI labs should pause their work for six months or continue with progress, and how do you believe the potential risks of AI development should be managed? Share your perspective in the comments section below.

Jamie Redman

Jamie Redman is the News Lead at Bitcoin.com News and a financial tech journalist living in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for Bitcoin, open-source code, and decentralized applications. Since September 2015, Redman has written more than 6,000 articles for Bitcoin.com News about the disruptive protocols emerging today.




Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

Read disclaimer

Articles You May Like

Utah bill doubling bonding authority for hospital project passes
Trump says he is a ‘dissident’ under siege from thugs in bleak speech
Online trading platform Webull is set to go public via a $7.3 billion SPAC deal
Trump defeats Haley in South Carolina Republican primary
Alabama airports could turn to public private partnerships under bill